Skip to content
New research mentoring cohorts open — book a free 15-minute consult, no obligation.
phdguide

Reliability

Methodology & design

Definition

The consistency of a measure — whether it yields the same results under repeated or equivalent conditions.

Reliability is the consistency of a measure — whether it produces stable results across items, occasions and raters. A reliable instrument is not necessarily valid: a scale that consistently measures the wrong thing is reliable but useless. Reliability is necessary for validity but does not guarantee it.

It comes in several forms. Internal consistency asks whether items of a scale hang together (Cronbach's alpha, composite reliability). Test-retest reliability asks whether the measure gives similar results on repeated administration. Inter-rater reliability asks whether independent coders agree, quantified with Cohen's kappa or intraclass correlation.

The working threshold for internal consistency is 0.70, with 0.80 and above considered good and values above 0.95 suggesting redundant items. Report reliability separately for each construct rather than for the whole questionnaire, and calculate it on your own sample rather than citing the original authors' figure.

Not sure where to start?

Book a free 15-minute consult. We'll map your next three steps — no obligation.

Ethical, compliant guidance

We provide academic support, mentoring, analysis, editing and structuring — not authorship. Your work stays compliant with university policies.