AI Journal Finder
Journals matched to your actual abstract
How to get a useful result
Give the finder your title, abstract and keywords rather than a one-line topic, and state your constraints: required indexing (Scopus, Web of Science, ABDC or UGC-CARE), whether you can pay an article processing charge, and how quickly you need a decision. A journal is a good match when its recent papers address similar questions with similar methods — not merely when its title contains your keywords.
Verify every suggestion yourself before you submit. Confirm current Scopus coverage in Scopus Sources, check the Web of Science Master Journal List or the ABDC list where they matter to your university, and look at the journal's own website for its aims and scope, review process and fees. Indexing changes every year, and journals are discontinued, so a listing that was accurate last year may not be today.
Watch for the signs of predatory publishing: promises of acceptance within days, unsolicited invitation emails, fees requested before review, editorial boards that cannot be verified, and websites that imitate the names of established journals. Read two or three recent articles in each shortlisted journal to judge their quality and fit, then submit to one journal at a time — simultaneous submission is treated as misconduct by legitimate publishers.
Frequently asked
Are the indexing claims verified?+
They are indicative and every output says so — indexing changes frequently, so you must verify each shortlisted journal on the official Scopus/UGC-CARE/ABDC list before submitting. The tool narrows the field; the official lists are the authority.
Will it recommend predatory journals?+
It is explicitly instructed never to, and the report includes the predatory warning-signs screen to run on ANY journal — including ones colleagues suggest.
Can it guarantee acceptance?+
No tool can — acceptance depends on peer review. Fit-matching dramatically reduces desk rejections, which is the failure mode journal choice actually controls.